• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • News
  • Topics
    • Common Sense
    • Congress
    • Debt
    • Government waste
    • Millenials
    • QuizCap
    • Taxes
  • Tools
    • Agencies
    • Memes That Matter
    • Research Library
    • Scavenger Hunt
  • Shop
  • What We’re About
  • Multimedia
  • What We’re About
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter signup
  • Give to the Cause

TBT: Congressional Beach Bums

By Adam Kazda | July 27, 2017

Today, the House is expected to vote on a four-bill spending package before it leaves for August recess. Included in that spending package is $37.6 billion for the Department of Energy and the Army Corps of Engineers. The levels of funding for those agencies are projected to be below FY2017 levels, but $3.2 billion more than what the White House requested in the President’s Budget. In addition, reports suggest that Congress will be beefing up various Army Corps of Engineers accounts.

Popular Posts
  1. Social Security: Good Intentions, Unintended Consequences
  2. What Sam Adams Can Teach Us About the Corporate Tax Revamp
  3. The New Taxation Without Representation

While the Army Corps of Engineers tries to do great work, Congress continually authorizes infrastructure projects that have created a backlog worth tens of billions of dollars. “Consequently, many important projects have stalled due to the misprioritization of federal funds,” says Tom Coburn’s 2009 Washed Out to Sea report.

While the new appropriations bill in Congress does prioritize funds for flood control projects, valuable resources are being taken from the Corps because of Congress’s parochial beachfront interests. According to Washed Out to Sea, “Roughly $100 million every year in federal funds is appropriated to ensuring coastal towns benefitting from lobbying and political influence on Capitol Hill maintain picturesque beaches for property owners and tourists.”

learn about our mission Artboard 1
× Follow us on Facebook and never miss a story.

These projects, called “beach nourishment,” take away funding from other infrastructure priorities, including dams. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, the average age for America’s 96,000 dams is 56, and listed 15,000 dams as “high risk” in its 2017 report.

The Weekly Chaser

Get the latest content, first.

“Most communities that secure federal beach replenishment earmarks appear to do so primarily because of political connections in Washington, D.C.,” says the Coburn report, and in the end “adding sediment to beaches is a costly, temporary fix.”

Rather than using federal tax dollars to improve the value of beachfront property, Congress should remove federal support for development on flood-prone areas altogether. This concept will be put to test in September, when Congress will have to reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) – a federal program that insures against flood risk, even for coastal houses that are repeatedly flooded out by storms. While most agree that this is a poor use of tax dollars, it is as predictable as the tides that coastal Congressmen from both parties will band together to keep tax dollars flowing to their beaches.

× Follow us on Twitter.

Read more about beach nourishment and the report Washed Out to Sea here!

sidebar

sidebar-alt

If you liked this, you’ll love these

Earmarks: Addictive at their Best, Criminal at their Worst

Read all about it Artboard 1

Engineer Gets Agency to Pay for Law Degree, Then Quits

Read all about it Artboard 1

Congress Charges Christmas Gifts to the Credit Card

Read all about it Artboard 1

Support Our Work

Federal agencies go largely unchecked, spending at will making use of inflated budgets. While some do very important work, we need to hold them accountable. You can do this by donating, emailing your legislator, or signing our petitions.

Donate Now

Sign Up for Pursuit Updates

Privacy Policy

Powered by the Foundation to Restore Accountability

Search
UNCOVER SOME GOVERNMENT WASTE?
share your opinion

Can you believe the US Government spends more money on it’s cable bill than on disaster relief?

NO! I’M FURIOUS! Eh, sounds right