• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • News
  • Topics
    • Common Sense
    • Congress
    • Debt
    • Government waste
    • Millenials
    • QuizCap
    • Taxes
  • Tools
    • Agencies
    • Memes That Matter
    • Research Library
    • Scavenger Hunt
  • Shop
  • What We’re About
  • Multimedia
  • What We’re About
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter signup
  • Give to the Cause

Senate Democrats Attempt to Pass $650 Billion Tax Cut

By Bryan Berky | October 24, 2019

The ease and level in which the Republican Party has thrown fiscal responsibility out the window over the last three years has been a galling display of hypocrisy that will have devastating impacts on the economic future of young Americans. But, Democrats showed this week that they too can get in on the hypocrisy action.

Popular Posts
  1. Social Security: Good Intentions, Unintended Consequences
  2. A Look At How American Tax Dollars Are Used in Ukraine
  3. What Sam Adams Can Teach Us About the Corporate Tax Revamp

Demagoguing the Republican tax bill that passed in 2017 as a tax cut for the rich and warning about the dangers of income inequality is the Democratic platform of late. 

Yet in an about face this week, Senate Democrats (with the exception of Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado) pushed for legislation that would cut federal taxes for the wealthy while adding $650 billion to the $22 trillion national debt.

× Follow us on Facebook and never miss a story.

Specifically, they tried to pass a resolution that would effectively eliminate the recently enacted cap on a valuable tax deduction – providing generous tax benefits that would accrue predominantly to the wealthy.  

The issue at hand is the changes the Republican tax bill made to the state and local tax deduction (SALT). Previously, the federal tax code allowed taxpayers to deduct the amount a person pays in state and local taxes from their federal taxes. The SALT deduction was one of the largest tax expenditures in the code, costing nearly $100 billion each year and was projected to cost $1.3 trillion over the 10-year period from 2017 to 2026.

The GOP tax bill that passed in 2017 capped the amount of state and local taxes that can be deducted at $10,000, which is about half of the average deductions taken by those that used the deduction in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey.

learn about our mission Artboard 1

A large majority of the benefits of the SALT deduction accrue to the wealthy. Almost half of the benefits go to the top five percent and 80 percent of the benefits go to the top twenty percent of income earners. Those making less than $100,000 annually will be largely unaffected, while higher income earners will be hit by the SALT change. For example, in New York City, the effective state and local income tax rate maxed out at 7.7 percent. Under the new provision, this will go up to 12.7 percent.

The Weekly Chaser

Get the latest content, first.

Attempting to dodge the new limit, New York, Connecticut and New Jersey concocted legislative workarounds to allow their wealthiest citizens to continue to get their federal tax breaks. One of the ideas is to set up a charity for them. Connecticut and New Jersey are setting up charitable funds that taxpayers can “donate” to instead of paying state taxes. This will allow the taxpayer to deduct the full amount of this payment because there is no cap on federal tax deductions for charitable giving.

The problem is that charitable giving has to go to charitable causes. In this case, the benefactors of the “charitable giving” are the donors themselves. How’s that for a loophole? 

The Treasury Department ruled that these dubious arrangements were not legal.

This week, Senate Democrats used a tool called a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) that allows Congress to prevent recently promulgated regulations from going into effect. The vote failed on a nearly party line basis (43-52), with Sen. Bennet and Sen. Paul (R-KY) being the only crossovers – and the $10,000 SALT deduction cap will survive for now.

The Democrats railed against the GOP tax bill as a giveaway to the rich. It was a fiscally irresponsible bill, but hardly a soaking of the wealthy. On the other hand, setting up charities as tax shelters is literally a giveaway to the rich. Which goes to show, Republicans do not have a monopoly on hypocrisy.

× Follow us on Twitter.

sidebar

sidebar-alt

If you liked this, you’ll love these

New Poll Says Fiscal Responsibility A Top American Issue

Read all about it Artboard 1

The Kentucky Shutdown: Who’s Really to Blame?

Read all about it Artboard 1

Fixing the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body

Read all about it Artboard 1

Support Our Work

Federal agencies go largely unchecked, spending at will making use of inflated budgets. While some do very important work, we need to hold them accountable. You can do this by donating, emailing your legislator, or signing our petitions.

Donate Now

Sign Up for Pursuit Updates

Privacy Policy

Powered by the Foundation to Restore Accountability

Search
UNCOVER SOME GOVERNMENT WASTE?
share your opinion

Can you believe the US Government spends more money on it’s cable bill than on disaster relief?

NO! I’M FURIOUS! Eh, sounds right