• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • News
  • Topics
    • Common Sense
    • Congress
    • Debt
    • Government waste
    • Millenials
    • QuizCap
    • Taxes
  • Tools
    • Agencies
    • Memes That Matter
    • Research Library
    • Scavenger Hunt
  • Shop
  • What We’re About
  • Multimedia
  • What We’re About
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter signup
  • Give to the Cause

Ronald Reagan and Paul Ryan Share One Common Regret

By Adam Kazda | December 21, 2018

Most public leaders have regrets when it’s their time to go, and typically they admit where the historians and the press will create holes in their legacies. The most famous Republican ever, Ronald Reagan, and the most famous Republican of this decade, Paul Ryan, shared the same regrets as they left public office. For both, it was the national debt.

Popular Posts
  1. Social Security: Good Intentions, Unintended Consequences
  2. What Sam Adams Can Teach Us About the Corporate Tax Revamp
  3. The Pentagon Cooks the Books Kevin Malone Style

“I’ve been asked if I have any regrets. Well, I do. The deficit is one,” said Ronald Reagan in his Farewell Address to the Nation. Dubbed as the “Great Communicator,” Reagan eloquently expressed his vision for a better America, promising to use conservative ideas to push America forward. One of the biggest draws of Ronald Reagan was his brashness on reversing the growth of government, bashing big government opponents for their expansionist ideas and their growth in federal spending. However, Reagan, as he admits in his farewell address, did not reverse the growth of government and did not put checks on federal spending.

When Reagan left office he had tripled the national debt. From $900 billion to $2.7 trillion. His liberal predecessors, Ford and Carter, only doubled it. In a 1988 Mises Institute publication, Sheldon L. Richman expressed the president’s failures on rolling back spending and big government:

× Follow us on Facebook and never miss a story.

The budget for the Department of Education, which candidate Reagan promised to abolish along with the Department of Energy, has more than doubled to $22.7 billion, Social Security spending has risen from $179 billion in 1981 to $269 billion in 1986. The price of farm programs went from $21.4 billion in 1981 to $51.4 billion in 1987, a 140% increase. And this doesn’t count the recently signed $4 billion “drought-relief” measure. Medicare spending in 1981 was $43.5 billion; in 1987 it hit $80 billion. Federal entitlements cost $197.1 billion in 1981—and $477 billion in 1987.

learn about our mission Artboard 1

Paul Ryan came to power similarly, promising to take on entitlement and budget reform, achieving neither. “He is commonly thought of as a fiscal crusader because of his austere budget blueprints, but Ryan voted for everything from Medicare Part D to the auto and bank bailouts to the recent, cap-busting spending increase he muscled through Congress,” penned Tim Alberta in a Politico piece after Paul Ryan announced his departure from public life.

The Weekly Chaser

Get the latest content, first.

The outgoing Speaker of the House admitted earlier this week the national debt is one of his biggest regrets. Having championed the Budget Control Act in 2011 that placed caps on spending and incentivized a long-term budget fix, Paul Ryan participated in what will be seen as one of the greatest generational transfers of wealth in history. Since 2011, over $6 trillion has been added to the national debt, and zero progress has been made on the $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Whatsmore, Paul Ryan as Speaker of the House championed the $300 billion budget cap increase earlier this year, reversing the actions of the Budget Control Act in 2011.

In a final ditch effort this year, both houses of Congress formed the Joint Select Committee on Budget and Appropriations Reform to fix the broken budget process. This nine month endeavor ended in November with nothing to show for it.

Both Reagan and Ryan did great things during their time in office. Though both failed to deliver on the one thing that had voters hopeful for the future – reversing the growth of government and lowering the country’s financial liabilities. If the two most vocal champions on reversing the course of government were unable to do so, is there any hope for the future?

In this age of hyper partisanship and extreme rhetoric, the one thing both Republicans and Democrats actually agree on is raising spending for their respective hallmarks, defense and social programs. But our country is in much deeper trouble than Congress is acting like, and drastic measures to get our country back on track will have to occur in order for the next generation to be prosperous. Will fiscal responsibility be seen as too extreme to both parties given the amount of political courage it will take to right the ship?

× Follow us on Twitter.

A new Congress with new members and fresh ideas will be sworn into office this January. A promising opportunity awaits the public servants willing to take on our nation’s toughest challenge. Success is of the utmost importance. Our future depends on it.

sidebar

sidebar-alt

If you liked this, you’ll love these

12 Items the Feds Still Found Money For Within the “Devastating” Budget Caps

Read all about it Artboard 1

Federal Mingling in Housing Goes Far Beyond the Mortgage Interest Deduction

Read all about it Artboard 1

Restoring Trust in Federal Trust Funds

Read all about it Artboard 1

Support Our Work

Federal agencies go largely unchecked, spending at will making use of inflated budgets. While some do very important work, we need to hold them accountable. You can do this by donating, emailing your legislator, or signing our petitions.

Donate Now

Sign Up for Pursuit Updates

Privacy Policy

Powered by the Foundation to Restore Accountability

Search
UNCOVER SOME GOVERNMENT WASTE?
share your opinion

Can you believe the US Government spends more money on it’s cable bill than on disaster relief?

NO! I’M FURIOUS! Eh, sounds right