• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • News
  • Topics
    • Common Sense
    • Congress
    • Debt
    • Government waste
    • Millenials
    • QuizCap
    • Taxes
  • Tools
    • Agencies
    • Memes That Matter
    • Research Library
    • Scavenger Hunt
  • Shop
  • What We’re About
  • Multimedia
  • What We’re About
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter signup
  • Give to the Cause

Heritage Areas: Undermining Our Future Because “Oooohhhh Pretty”

By Drew White | June 28, 2018

As this completely uneventful week comes to a close with absolutely nothing of significance occurring, it’s important to look back and take stock of what we may have missed.

Popular Posts
  1. Social Security: Good Intentions, Unintended Consequences
  2. The Pentagon Cooks the Books Kevin Malone Style
  3. What Sam Adams Can Teach Us About the Corporate Tax Revamp

While the Senate was busy thoughtfully spending a few billion extra on energy subsidies and “deliberating” the nearly $1 trillion food and farm welfare bill, the House was mainly focused on setting their “compromise” immigration bill on fire on the floor. That is, of course, when they weren’t passing legislation to increase the debt, jeopardize private property rights, and add over a million acres to the federal government’s property.

What’s that you say? That last one sounds important.

× Follow us on Facebook and never miss a story.

Well indeed it is, buckaroo! If only our elected officials could be bothered to actually debate such things instead of passing massive land-grabbing legislation by voice.

Which is precisely what happened.

In a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it moment, the House couldn’t even be bothered to cast a vote on H.R. 1791, a bill that created a massive new heritage area out in Washington state.

Heritage Areas

learn about our mission Artboard 1

The National Park Service (NPS)—which provides planning and dollars for these sites—defines national heritage areas as “places where historic, cultural, and natural resources combine to form cohesive, nationally important landscapes.”

The Weekly Chaser

Get the latest content, first.

Separate from national parks, national heritage areas are distinguished by the fact that they are lived-in areas and are usually managed by state, local, or nonprofit entities—many times a collaboration of all the above, including the NPS. This presents unique complexities and challenges to administering them, especially as the National Park Service faces an increasingly insurmountable maintenance backlog.

Indeed—a 2013 report by former Senator Tom Coburn suggested that the deferred maintenance at the National Park Service was nearly $12 billion. The cost of the backlog for the entire Department of the Interior, which houses NPS, is likely much higher.

With the creation of a new national heritage area, the backlog to the National Park Service is only going to increase—to say nothing about added tax dollars required to keep these areas up. The Mountains to Sound Greenway national heritage area is estimated to include roughly 1.5 million acres in total.

The federal government already owns more than 640 million acres of land. In fact, one federal agency—the Bureau of Land Management—has more land under its control than the entire nation of France and Germany combined! Adding even more land to the federal ledger is the last thing that Congress should be doing—particularly a congress run by a party that ostensibly stands for federalism, property rights, and fiscal responsibility among other things. I know, I know. Try not to laugh too hard.

And while many millions of American families and tourists enjoy the vast swathes of beauty that America has been blessed with in our national parks each and every year (including yours truly), the fact remains that our nation’s parks are facing a steady decline in their upkeep and maintenance.

This means more money coming out of our paychecks to try to keep up with the backlog. It also means more opportunities for people living in or adjacent to these areas to have their property rights threatened. It is not at all uncommon for the management entities of national heritage areas to implement restrictive zoning and land development regulations for those in the area. These “regulatory takings” require no compensation to property owners.

And perhaps the least discussed aspect of these heritage area designations is how they’re done. The lack of transparency and statutory authorization to implement such areas is of increasing concern. In practice, the creation of heritage areas is little more than an earmark to favored constituencies in home districts.

× Follow us on Twitter.

Yes—the Puget Sound and many of the mountains in Washington state are beautiful and deserving of proper upkeep to preserve them for future generations. Just as hundreds of other places across America are as well. But creating a new government designation—with no debate—that gobbles up millions of acres of land, adds to taxpayers’ already strained wallets, and burdens an already over-burdened National Park Service is likely to make such preservation harder, not easier.

sidebar

sidebar-alt

If you liked this, you’ll love these

Three Facts About Our Future That Every Young American Needs to Know

Read all about it Artboard 1

Sen. Paul’s Bill to Evaluate Zombie Programs Could Have Stopped Waste Before It Happened

Read all about it Artboard 1

Why Small Government Waste is a Big Deal

Read all about it Artboard 1

Support Our Work

Federal agencies go largely unchecked, spending at will making use of inflated budgets. While some do very important work, we need to hold them accountable. You can do this by donating, emailing your legislator, or signing our petitions.

Donate Now

Sign Up for Pursuit Updates

Privacy Policy

Powered by the Foundation to Restore Accountability

Search
UNCOVER SOME GOVERNMENT WASTE?
share your opinion

Can you believe the US Government spends more money on it’s cable bill than on disaster relief?

NO! I’M FURIOUS! Eh, sounds right